Suicide Sisterhood?

<!– /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:”"; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Arial; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {color:blue; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} p {mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0cm; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0cm; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} @page Section1 {size:595.3pt 841.9pt; margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} –>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:”";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

RE: SUICIDE SISTERHOOD

The media as usual have got it all wrong. They have assumed that all men are or will be criminals and that women are sweet and innocent and need protecting. There have been many examples of this sexual apartheid prejudice throughout the media. Women are treated in a different and superior category by the media. For example, you will have seen a headline like “six people killed including 3 women and children’. What were the rest? Monkeys?

Following on from this has been the prejudiced treatment by the Police using so-called ‘profiling’. In other words, when the Police are patrolling, they have a basic assumption that it is men that are causing crimes and hence 95% of those stopped and searched by the Police are male. You are twenty times more likely than a woman to be stopped and searched. Theoretically, the Police need a reason to stop and search, but are you realistically going to challenge their decision to stop you? Yeah right!

The criminal justice system is also prejudiced against men. There are 80,000 men in prison and only 4000 women. For every comparable crime, men get a custodial sentence where women get a community sentence, or if both receive a custodial sentence then men get a longer sentence. My other articles have highlighted differential treatment of men and women in various cases.

Of course, with terrorism, you do not know someone is a terrorist until they pull out the trigger for their bomb or otherwise after the event. Hence the Police are petrified of every man they are dealing with and likely to shoot on sight just in case (remember Jean Charles de Menezes shot at Stockwell tube station in July 2005). It would not happen to a woman.

Not surprisingly, the terrorists have realised this western weakness of preferential treatment for women and are now beginning to train women as suicide bombers.

So what will the patronised and prejudiced police do now? Surely they cannot treat everyone equally at last? Perhaps that should be equally badly? I doubt it. As a result more policemen will be killed because they were prejudiced into believing that the woman could not be a terrorist. A dangerous presumption.

For more click: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7667031.stm

Vigilante’s charter? Sexual apartheid in the UK.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7612315.stm

The witch hunt starts today. The government allows anyone to ask
for details on the convictions of anyone else under the pretext of
sexual offenders. Yeah right. Of course they do not expect this to be
used sensibly – it is doubtful if the government cares about the
likely persecution of people on the register or what use this
information will be put to – except maybe in the extreme.

This is a vigilante’s charter and we will no doubt hear of stories of
men being persecuted and attacked – yet another success for the
anti-male feminists in this (single) mother land.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/norfolk/7662105.stm

Sex offender’s death is murder by strangulation.

The government has now made it possible for ‘anyone’ to obtain the details of people (normally men) on the Sex Offender’s Register (SOR). Is this the first of many deaths by the vigilantes?
Nobody in the media has any sympathy for this group. Few people in society have any sympathy. Therefore it seems an ideal target to turn a blind eye and allow the ordinary vigilante group to get on and rid the world of this person.

However, what happened to human rights? They have been punished, received a long custodial sentence and banned from working with children. That should be the end of it, but no the government is happy to allow their details to be easily available and no doubt anyone with a grudge against society can vent their anger on these people and nobody will care.

Yet another sign of our retreat to the gutter of civilisation and away from the broader themes of a compassionate society. And of course it is yet again men who mostly suffer. Not surprisingly few men want to be a primary school teacher or indicated any interest in working with children.

http://www.northantset.co.uk/news/Shortage-of-male-teachers-in.4545147.jp
only 11% of primary school teachers are men, less than 3% of pre-school/nursery/childminders are male. Why? Because of the risk of being caught up in this over-reactive anti-paedophile culture.

Further evidence of the division of society into the female and male sections. The females want to keep the children on their side of the wall and drive men into a corner on the far side of reality surrounded by a high wall. Sexual apartheid is alive and kicking and nobody (except me) is even able to identify it is happening.

How far will a woman go to have a baby?

Hi Timocrat

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/7659430.stm

In UK today there is a court case of a woman who has had her dead husband’s sperm removed and she wants to have a baby. Normally the court requires the consent of the father before this procedure can be carried out No doubt she will succeed in changing the law, but how far would you go to have a baby?
Like Madonna would you go to another country where the rules are less strict and ‘buy’ one?
Or would you have a one night stand and not tell the father you were not on the pill?
Or would you try and adopt or foster?

Do you think the father should be aware of what is happening?
There is a big difference adopting a baby that is already here and for whatever reason its parents cannot/not allowed to be the parents and deliberately creating one as a single parent in these circumstances.
The child is a separate human being with its own rights. It sounds like this woman is being selfish and having a child for herself and not thinking of the child’s best interests – namely – to have a chance of having a father. It is bad enough when relationships breakdown or father’s die that children end up with only one parent, but to deliberately create a child without a father seems utterly unacceptable to me. as a father I believe children need both parents.

I think this woman has gone too far though. But is this worse than using a sperm bank or egg donor? They are all legal even for single women.
There are two basic types of IVF – so called assisted fertilisation – where the mother’s egg and father’s sperm are mixed in a lab and then reimplanted. And donor fertilisation – where someone else’s egg and/or someone else’s sperm are fertilised and then implanted in the woman.

The first type I have no problem with, but the second type raises important questions about who exactly is the mummy and daddy? I do not think we should go that far in making babies. That is where I would draw the line – at least at the state’s expense. if people want to create babies and have the money to do so they will always find a way – but tax-payer’s should not help these artificial families. It will be far too confusing for the child in determining its ancestry.

Once again the courts are being asked to determine the limits of feminism – how far can women go to have babies without men. I doubt if this woman will lose sicne the courts continue to do everything asked of them, by women, but not by men.

Latest update from the (single) mother-land as at 9th October 2008

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
<!– /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:”"; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Arial; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} @page Section1 {size:595.3pt 841.9pt; margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} –>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:”";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

1)  Hooray, someone is examining men’s health for a change – and
surprise surprise men age as well! And so does their sperm! Wow
revolutionary!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7492323.stm

2) Hooray! Whilst it is only a small step, it is highly significant.
The opposition conservatives, at last, have realised that positive
reinforcement is better than punishment to get people to do things.
Well at least to reward people for recycling rather than punishing
them if they don’t!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7496709.stm

3)Employment news – someone else has realised that by discriminating

in favour of pregnant women to absurd extent with 12 months maternity

leave and significant amounts of uncertainty for employers, surprise

surprise less people want to employ women who may have babies! Easy

solution – extend the rights of fathers to be the same and allow

parents to choose which parent takes the time off or if separated

allow them both half each and then there is no need for

discrimination! Too easy for this feminist government. No doubt there

will be more pernicious measures imposed on firms believing them all
guilty of disfavouring women of baby-making age.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7504637.stm

Amazingly the newspapers have agreed!
http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article4333843.ece

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/14/equality.gender

4) someone with a realistic view of sex, sexuality and bdsm – why is
it that connecting sex and violence makes the feminists go white with
anger? Some people choose this lifestyle. Master and slave can be
either way round gender-wise – of course the feminists are
anti-heterosexual sex of any kind and view sex as man master woman
slave – firstly some choose that as a preference and secondly some
choose the reverse as a preference. So what – why should anti-sex
feminists cast their opinion about something they know nothing about?
The letters make interesting reading as well. Well done BBC for an
interesting in-depth discussion without the usual anti-male comments.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7504758.stm

5) Not optimistic, but at least parents are mentioned – however
punishing parents for their children’s crimes still is too late in the
process. Prevention is better than cure! Rewarding good parents is
better than punishing bad parents. What about teaching parents from
before they are parents? There is 9 months between conception and
birth; this period should be used to train parents. If they pass the
course then they should gain part of their benefits. The rest of the
proposals are obvious nonsense as they have all been used before and
just make the problem worse! More of the same is hardly going to make
things better!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7506618.stm

6)Hooray! Someone else has realised that men are far more likely to be
attacked than women and maybe men should be considered as victims!
First ever warning to men to be careful!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7510823.stm

7) Common sense has prevailed in South Africa – maybe. Proposals to
legalise prostitution in a safe area! Obviously the right thing to do,
hence the UK Government would not dream of doing it! Well done South
Africa!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7509357.stm

When you are a man in a woman’s world any small victory is a vital
step in stopping the elimination of men as a group and this is a small
but vital step -The feminists have been portraying circumcision of men
as a weapon to oppose spread of AIDS – like the use of the male condom
it also has the effect of reducing male pleasure in sexual intercourse
- a win-win for the feminists. However, circumcision of women is
illegal because it reduces female enjoyment of sex – so why is male
circumcision not illegal?
Clearly Kenya is more civilised than the UK! I bet not many people say
that very often! I like being the exception!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7514431.stm

9) Allowing thousands of men to be killed unnecessarily in Iraq and
Afghanistan and you keep your job. Walking into a pub and breaching
the no smoking ban and you get fired! Talk about disproportionate
punishment – for a man of course!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/south_east/7514458.stm

10) Someone else has noticed how unfair the plans to replace the
council tax with a local income tax are on workers – here MOD point
out the huge cost to their staff – yet another anti-male measure since
men generally earn more than women and work longer hours. Also another
anti-worker measure – why should people work as opposed to surviving
on benefits and hence not paying this unfair charge – better off not
working! What kind of attitude is the government encouraging? Also
divides further workers and non-workers – the workers of course having
to support the non-workers. I might go on strike!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/7515699.stm

11) Not often I agree with the pope – but he is right about the problem
- a spiritual desert is spreading across the western world – replacing
morals and values with greed and the pursuit of money and selfishness.

What is needed is a secular list of morals and values to stand
alongside those for the religious ones – where people reject the
church they are also rejecting morals and values – something positive
is needed to fill the void – I bet it is mainly single mothers who are
rejecting religion!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7515888.stm

12) A needle in they haystack – an article about male DV victims and
the lucky few who made it to one of the tiny men’s refuges compared
with the hundreds of female ones.
The government takes male victims seriously – yeah right – who is she kidding?
http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/story.aspx?storycode=6500406

13) Some good news on prostate cancer for a change – a possible
breakthrough in treatment!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7502238.stm

14) Sounds like another battle over custody with transatlantic
connections – no doubt the press and the courts will take the
mother’s side, but it would be interesting to know the truth behind
this story.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7537034.stm

15)More signs of the ’success’ of feminism – massive jump in
alcohol-fuelled attacks by women – since they know they will receive
little or no punishment as compared with men, there is no disincentive
- not that there is much for the men either!

http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/cn_news_home/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=336051

16) This story shows the pro-female bias in news reporting. To the
media, clearly women are more important than men. Somalia bombing
kills 16 women and possibly some others plus injures others…what are
these others? Chimpanzees perhaps?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7539395.stm

17) More indications of the more favourable treatment of women when
being violent – this article shows the success of feminism in
encouraging women to do all the bad things that men used to do.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7550755.stm

18) More signs of the feminist control over men everywhere. Here in
Brazil an English man is arrested for non-payment of child support -
has the world gone mad? He has not been able to see his child, why
should he pay anything? It is a totally disproportionate punishment
for a penal rate of tax that almost only applies to fathers.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/kent/7550821.stm

19) With conservatives 20% ahead in the opinion polls (and who
believes opinion polls) David Cameron’s comments are those of a leader
in waiting. So when he talks of fixing the broken society as his
priority I give him huge applause. Of course the problem is HOW he
thinks he can do it. Unless he has been reading my blogs, I doubt if
he will be as radical and hence successful as I propose. He will
probably simply tinker with the benefit system. But it is a start.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7566979.stm

20) You are just not allowed to tell the truth anymore if it reflects
badly on women. Why is it not politically correct to say that there
are some women who are ugly? Why is it not PC to suggest that people
choose partners based on looks and ugly women have very little chance
of getting a mate unless the men are desperate as they are in Mount
Isa apparently? Why is it not PC for women to admit that they want a
man? Oops of course the feminists are anti-male and
anti-heterosexuality and hence anything that might help people pair up
is bad news for them – particularly as ugly women rejected by men
are the best breeding ground for extreme feminists perhaps?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7567239.stm

21) Further evidence of the pro-female bias in gender selection on
birth? An indication from Australia that there are more women than men
there.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7589382.stm

22) Further attempts by the feminists to undermine anything
competitive including team sports in order to undermine boys’ chances
in future lives as boys thrive on competition.

‘political correctness gone mad’

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7599973.stm

23) Once again another distorted survey only asking girls’ views on
self-image and self-harm. Once again boys are ignored, even though
suicide rates are higher amongst boys than girls. Because girls are
continually asked and listened to the problem is less severe with
them. Because boys are ignored and treated as irrelevant the problem
is far worse.
When will the media realise that everyone is equally important not
just girls/women?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7502678.stm

24) an ‘arrest’ of a single mother who left three kids 11 and under
alone whilst on holiday. Why did she not leave them all with their
father?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/west_yorkshire/7609727.stm
25) The only group to speak publicly about false allegations is the
teachers’ trade union.

Here once again shows the massive increase in false allegations by
children against teachers – and no doubt little if any punishment for
the pupils. Just like when women make false allegations against men.
Why should it be any different?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7613129.stm

26) The witch hunt starts today. The government allows anyone to ask
for details on the convictions of anyone else under the pretext of
sexual offenders. Yeah right. Of course they do not expect this to be
used sensibly – it is doubtful if the government cares about the
likely persecution of people on the register or what use this
information will be put to – except maybe in the extreme.

This is a vigilante’s charter and we will no doubt hear of stories of
men being persecuted and attacked – yet another success for the
anti-male feminists in this (single) mother land.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7612315.stm

27) Good news? Girls who have consensual sex under 16 with boys under
16 to be treated as criminals the same as boys – shock horror equal
treatment in the criminal justice system? Surely not! Anyway it has
been delayed as it might cause problems to girls! Yeah right – what
about the boys?

She added: “I don’t want a distinction between boys and girls. What I
am saying is if you want to make things equal, let’s make them equally
better and not equally worse.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/7646934.stm

28) Another pointless study to help girls – why were they not asked
about fathers as well as mothers? Obvious really in the feminist
media.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7648068.stm

29) Yawn! Another pointless study looking at two symptoms with
increased risk as a result of being brought up by single mothers and
surprise surprise they are linked! Same cause different symptoms -
when will these so called experts realise where they are going wrong?
Of course mental illness is increased in the absence of a father. of
course cancer risk is increased through smoking, poor diet and all the
other things that are at increased risk if brought up without a
father. Surprise surprise there appears to be a link!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7648460.stm

30) Interesting debate over so-called reverse discrimination in South
Korea. Is it right to reserve an occupation for blind people? Would it
not be better to fight the discrimination against blind people in all
other areas?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7649374.stm

31) Testing limits on freedom of speech – should someone with totally
unacceptable views be deported to a country where holding those views
is a crime? I don’t think so! Whatever next?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7652274.stm

32) Contrast these two news stories on parents who killed their children…

A father described as pure evil – life with a minimum of 17 years in prison.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7650163.stm

Mother life with min 15 years
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/7631734.stm

Notice the attempt to ‘justify’ the mother’s murder. Much more
sympathetic article.
Surprised that the sentences were so similar.

Lessons not learned by SS – father’s concerns ignored…
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/jan/28/ukcrime.childprotection

and another case where no one intervened as it was a single mother as
the murderer
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/01/10/bodies.found/index.html

and most disgusting of all, someone trying to profit from ‘justifying’
the murderous mothers and blame it on someone else…
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0814756433/truecrimes-20

33)Further evidence of EU-wide anti-male discrimination. Extension of
maternity leave for mothers only – so who will be doing the work
whilst the women have a holiday? And as one astute observer commented
-”Ultimately some of the smallest businesses may think twice about
employing young women through fear of them going on maternity leave,”
he said.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7650988.stm

34) How can it be self-defence due to provocation to poison someone
over many months? What complete rubbish! Only a woman would try and
run that kind of absurd defence knowing that the judges’ prejudice is
in her favour. Provocation as a defence has to be real, immediate and
in the heat of the moment – this cold blooded calculated slow burn was
none of these. If she wanted to go off with another man, she should
have just left. Maybe there are still limits to the extreme of
feminism in courts – at least in Hong Kong – not here.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7653942.stm

35) Not that I wish to enter the American election debate, but again
this shows the limits of feminism – using her position to persecute a
man that may or may not have a custody battle against a friend of hers
shows that there are no limits for Palin  to be anti-male. She seems
an ideal candidate for the US president and just what the world does
not need – a man-hating extreme feminist as leader of the ‘free’
world.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7653938.stm

36) Further evidence supporting my argument of the damage to society
of being brought up without a father and hence in the more deprived
areas of the country – study here shows and repeats the fact that
people in deprived areas smoke more and hence die more from lung
cancer – here in west Scotland the worst area in the UK and most
deprived.

“We know that smoking rates are linked to deprivation – rates are
around 10% higher in working class communities.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/glasgow_and_west/7654692.stm

37) Notice the anti-male sentiment in this complaint about a programme
on the BBC – Nobody complained about a family treating a man as a dog.
It was only when they urged him to have sex with a woman that there
were complaints! In other words, what is done to men however horrible
and demeaning makes good television, even talking about doing
something to a woman produces horror and revulsion! Shows further
evidence of the increased division in treatments of the sexes. So much
for equal treatment! Not on the BBC!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7656578.stm

38) further attempts to brainwash young people into conventional
thinking – and to report anyone who thinks differently. Still using
the excuse of terrorism to hide their real policy of mind control.
Dangerous ground

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7656607.stm

39) More sexist anti-male nonsense in Iran – I hope this car is ten
times the price of the normal one – to penalise extremist views!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7657810.stm

40) Unbelievable! Talk about rape! Taking sperm from a dead man to try
and have another baby! What lengths will women go to in order to become single
mothers? As if the planet is not over-populated enough already?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/7659430.stm

41) Sounds like another woman who could not cope with being a single
mother. Rather than give the children to the father she killed them by
setting fire to the house and left them in it. Sorry it is only
manslaughter when the mother kills the children.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/sussex/7659538.stm

42) Men may be of more use than the feminists think after all! The sperm
may be able to be used for stem cells – are we worth more dead than
alive?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7659120.stm