More news from the (single -) motherland
1)Well 4.5 years seems a lot to me – most of the mothers who have done far worse get far less. Also his partner got nothing – the male partners of women accused of killing the babies are usually sentenced as well – not happy about this – women who abort their babies do so legally before birth. does not seem fair somehow
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e…re/7390271.stm
2) Yet again this study connects symptoms in children brought up badly by disproportionately single mothers and tries to cross relate! It is obvious to me that they are all bad behaviour which is much more likely when brought up by poor parents in a broken family. They are either incredibly stupid or doing it deliberately! Am I the only one who can see the bigger picture?!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7389980.stm
3) Well – the Chinese also treat women differently and better. Breaking up a female only protest and no arrests?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7394672.stm
4) Is this law anti-male? so much for gender equality in Spain! Now that women are in the majority, is the work of the feminists finished or only half done?
“A new law attempts to protect women with specialist judges, legal services and restraining orders on violent men within hours.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7375230.stm
5) More progress to eliminate the last requirements that fathers are involved in IVF -
These are the creation of hybrid embryos, “saviour siblings” and the proposal that IVF clinics should no longer have to consider the need for a “father” figure when deciding whether to offer treatment.
Great! Just what the world needs! More children artificially created without a father!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7394591.stm
6) In the one corner the feminists who resist any kind of reality for children, any kind of learning, any kind of structure – everything that suits girls. In the other corner the sensible people, the masculinists and anyone with an ounce of common sense – childhood is about learning how to cope with being an adult and adult life is competitive.
Equals the battle over testing to improve school performance or stressing out children.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e…on/7396125.stm
7) Somebody else agrees with me! The importance of the father being lost…
http://www.civitas.org.uk/press/prcs73.php
8)My view of wars and armies is that the feminists use them to get rid of surplus men. Making men believe they are (dead) heroes is one way to cover the horrible reality that even if you survive the war your head will be badly screwed up by the sights and horrors making you unfit to be a partner and hence outside society and away from women – ideal for the anti-male feminists
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7408441.stm
9)Further evidence of the feminists control over Parliament and over reality! Twisted reality that is! Here is more complete and utter nonsense from so-called intelligent people….in debating artifical births and whether a father is needed…
“It’s clear that if the need for a father was retained, the legislation would place additional burdens on single women and same sex female couples.” How terrible! Oh dear – a woman needs to have a man and that’s discrimination against single women and lesbians! But not against men? Oh that is irrelevant as men are lesser beings with no rights anyway.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7410934.stm
10) An interesting experiment into the effect of hand-outs on poor people – Here in Namibia – because the hand-out is so low, it is not (yet?) causing dependence in the way that our extremely high benefit levels do. The money is largely going round quickly as poor people have little idea or capacity to save and hence it benefits everyone and the government gets the money back quickly through taxes. At the moment it is fair as given equally to everyone. Unlike here where the benefits system distorts family dynamics and encourages and increases single motherhood as a means to riches.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7415814.stm
11) Iain Duncan-Smith continues his campaign to raise our issue – even if he is not totally clear on what and why at least he is starting to understand the basic issues . And because his name is well known, he has a chance of making it into print, unlike the rest of us!
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new…cle3997537.ece
12) More anti-male discrimination – provision of mental health services to prisoners – of course the feminists want to build more prisons to house more men and keep them away from the women and once locked up they do not care what happens to them
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7415436.stm
Is early release a sign of success or failure of the government’s determination to lock up men?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7422737.stm
13) Whilst disagreeing with Amnesty International’s discriminatory obsession with only violence against ‘women and children’ (sic), this is an interesting summary of human rights abuses in the world.
“Injustice, inequality and impunity are the hallmarks of our world today.” Can’t disagree with that!
Amnesty’s document accuses the US of failing to provide a moral compass for its international peers.
“As the world’s most powerful state, the USA sets the standard for government behaviour globally,” the report says.
It notes that Washington “had distinguished itself in recent years through its defiance of international law”.
Can’t disagree with that!
But no mention of discrimination and human rights abuses against men as that is considered ‘normal’
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7422528.stm
14)Not an easy job to decide when and whether to take children into care, but I am happy to join in with criticism of the Local Authorities and the SS generally… even if for different reasons.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7422902.stm
15) An unbelievably low sentence for attempted murder! As it was a woman of course – only suspended sentence!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e…re/7423528.stm
16)Feminists desperately scratching around for something to complain about – here a man is lied to by his prospective wife on a ‘key issue’ – her virginity – and rightly obtains an annulment – the feminists demand it is overturned as why shouldn’t women be able to lie and get away with it? Well done the French courts!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7428166.stm
17) More signs of the collapse of single motherland – youth drinking alcohol on the increase.
Here are more failed plans for punishment based solutions. Clearly they have no chance of working until the government looks at tackling the causes – children brought up without a father!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7430584.stm
and again – whilst this is better in that it targets parents, it is still punishment based rather than reward based and still refuses to look at the causes – since that would mean criticsing feminsim.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7429701.stm
18)A useful summary of some of the differences between state and private education. Of course, the main advantage of private education is avoiding most of the kids brought up by single mothers! Funny – that never got mentioned!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e…on/7440022.stm
19)The architect of new Labour’s anti-male persecution gets some personal notice of the hatred and dislike of her policies by F4J. All the Conservatives want to talk about is the folly of publishing the addresses of MP’s second homes! Shows where their priorities lay!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7442435.stm
20) Feminazi will be happy – mob rule incites another murder of somebody not even convicted of a crime that the media have whipped the mob up into a frenzy over…
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/7441793.stm
21)Typical government! Blame everyone but themselves!
Schools with ‘poor’ GCSE’s are normally in areas of high deprivation where the kids normally grow up without a male role model – high levels of single mothers. These kids have typically poor parenting low self esteem and hence no motivation or determination to achieve or even be able to behave at school. The schools then have to spend disproportionate amounts of time ’socialising’ the kids to the detriment of academic study. The end result is ‘poor’ GCSE’s. Schools like the Manor do a fantastic job at raising the expectations of ‘poor’ kids and giving them a chance of some GCSE’s. This is termed ‘added value’ and the Manor was one of the top schools in the UK at this – basically if your kid is ‘poor’ quality then the Manor is the best school for them, if you have a ‘good’ kid then the Manor is a disaster! Of course nobody talks in these terms (except me!) so it is far easier to say the Manor is a ‘failing’ school because the average kid gets less than 3 GCSE’s but the reality is given the kids going in it does incredibly well to get any GCSE’s for any of them!
The Government needs to tackle its policy of rewarding and encouraging disproportionately single mothers to have children without a male role model and then not care whether they do a good job or a crap job – turning a blind eye until it is too late when the SS get involved. Hence my involvement with FNF – the presence or absence of the father is the key determining factor as to whether kids are more or less likely to succeed – of course it is not absolute – I am aware of your situation – just the probability – and that is what government should be basing its policies on – not failed extreme feminist anti-male and anti-father rhetoric.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7444822.stm
22)
Further proof that false allegations swamp real ones – this time on the tax cheats phone line. Why should it be any different in the family courts? Since there is no punishment for making false allegations -
“One woman made 68 calls to report her husband – none of which had led to an investigation, the Public Accounts Committee was told.” Why wasn’t she prosecuted for perverting the course of justice? up to 5 years in prison would stop the nonsense! Or have her named and shamed?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7448962.stm
23) Yet another anti-relationship and disproportionately anti-male piece of legislation – this time in Egypt meaning that men who want to marry women more than 25 years younger than themselves must pay $80,000 to the government to ‘purchase’ the right to marry her!
Unbelievable!
Tags: discrimination, gender, human rights, UK
