If nothing else will make men sit up and read, this article on every
man’s perceived favourite subject might! This is an article on sex,
sex crimes and related issues.
Introduction -Sex
If you are an extreme feminist and want to drive men and women apart
completely, then sex is the enemy. Well, not ALL sex, but heterosexual
sex. Their aim appears to have been to firstly scare men and women
away from having relationships at all by exaggerating the risks – ‘all
men are rapists’ or violent etc, secondly to scare men and women away
from having sex, by spreading fears over STD’s and AIDS in particular.
(See summary for more conclusions on this issue). In addition, they
are trying to suggest that sex is something that ‘is done TO women’
rather than with them. For other aspects of sex including sex crimes
and sexuality – read on!
Impotence
Women have tried to attack men at their weakest point by ridiculing
his size, performance and ability to cause women orgasms. Men are
expected to KNOW how any woman ‘ticks’ without any clues from the
woman, just indirect ‘hints’, thus he can be easily criticised for
getting it wrong. Sex becomes a ‘performance’ rather than fun.
Criticisms lead to doubts to impotence to more doubts to more
criticism to end of sex to end of relationship – success for the
feminists.
Most of the research on impotence has reached the conclusion that most
causes are psychological rather than physical. When Viagra was first
introduced, I saw the results of the trials on male ‘guinea pigs’,
half given Viagra and half given a ‘placebo’ (non-active Viagra-shaped
pill). Clearly the men did not know which they were given. Whilst the
Viagra sample produced very high satisfaction ratings, the placebo
also achieved high improvements, showing that simply believing that it
MIGHT be a pill to prevent impotence broke the negative feedback loop
described above.
It is interesting to note how long it took for Viagra to become
available for widespread use – and to contrast the speed of
introduction of the latest treatment for breast cancer, which is
extremely expensive and might only save a few women’s lives, but no
delay there!
Viagra also appears to have a positive effect for women’s sexual
responses, but a new drug has recently become available for them,
without any delay of course.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6495211.stm
Hormone Replacement Therapy – Menopause and andropause
Following on from the above is the use of testosterone in treating impotence.
Whilst it is widely believed that men’s testosterone levels decline
naturally with age and hence his sex drive, what is not so well known
is that this is not inevitable, but reversible. The use of TRT
(Testosterone replacement therapy) has been widely used for men who
have had one or both testes removed as a result of illness or injury
and the effects were promising. Whilst women are expected to go
through menopause in the 45-55 range and the side effects of this -
night sweats, loss of libido, motivation, mood swings, osteoporosis
etc are well known and HRT using oestrogen was introduced many years
ago (albeit the medical establishment were reluctant at the time) and
very successfully, the male equivalent has had a much more difficult
path. For some reason, the negatives of female HRT are exaggerated by
the medical establishment, rather than the positives. Could this also
have anything to do with the fact that if a woman has a low sex drive
after menopause she may be less interested in her partner and he may
leave looking for a more active (younger?) model and the feminists are
determined to break up heterosexual relationships at all costs?
TRT has been phenomenally successful for those few who are prepared to
pay privately for the treatment. My father became one of the first
back in the late 1980s and has been using it for 20 years. I have been
using it for the last 2-3 years. We both believe that our high levels
of motivation, drive and determination are largely due to TRT. I
certainly believe that fighting the feminists would have drained me by
now without TRT and it is only the discrimination against men in the
health service (see other article) that has prevented TRT being
introduced for men for free, not the statistics.
The big downside is the increased risk of cancers – prostate cancer
for men, breast and cervical for women. However, the failure of the
NHS to provide proper regular screening for women before and during
HRT treatment has led to the increased deaths. As soon as cancer is
detected, then HRT must stop. In fact, the private blood tests that
TRT patients take before treatment include a PSA test and are likely
to show up the early stages of prostate cancer in time for treatment.
Out of 1500 male patients in the highest risk category (ie over 60),
my Doctor has only seen two cases of prostate cancer, both caught at
the beginning. Incidentally, he has had almost no cases of Parkinsons
or Alzheimers either – so it is possible that high levels of
testosterone may prevent both of these conditions as well.
Testosterone can also be used to aid a woman’s sex drive. The TRT
cream used for men has been used by women as well. Clearly a small
amount of testosterone has a disproportionate effect on a woman’s sex
drive!
It should also be mentioned at this point that men suffer the same
side effects as women during the menopause – the male equivalent is
the andropause. Generally the symptoms are less severe as the change
takes place more slowly and over a longer period of time.
Vasectomy
What is particularly interesting is the connection with vasectomies.
Whilst this operation is advertised as being merely a ’snip’ (the
feminists would say that since it is done to men!), there are serious
side effects in a large minority of patients. Whilst only about 5% of
the male population have had vasectomies (as far as we can tell as no
accurate records are kept), around 20% of my doctor’s patients have
had vasectomies. Thus the risk of entering andropause is dramatically
increased by a vasectomy. They are also much younger than the rest of
his patients, typically around 7-10 years after the operation, the
patients notice the lack of motivation and sex drive.
It is not surprising given that the sperm is still being produced by
the testes when the tube is cut and tied. In a significant minority of
cases, the ‘knot’ leaks sperm into the body cavity where it is treated
as an ‘invader’ and the body generates antibodies to kill it. The
testes then swells up and has to be removed. This is not mentioned in
the information sheets provided by (female) doctors. My doctor
described it as ‘tying a knot in the barrel of a rifle and being
surprised that when you pull the trigger it blows up in your face’!
I would never recommend vasectomies to any man!
Circumcision
On the subject of unfair medical treatment of men, is the subject of
circumcision. Whilst this barbaric practice has been made illegal for
women, but is being actively encouraged for men as a prevention of
AIDS.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6176209.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6502855.stm
Unusually for the BBC, there is a balanced account of the pros and
cons on their health pages -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/conditio…mcision1.shtml
The key paragraph being -
“Some teenagers and men who were circumcised shortly after birth
describe feeling physically and psychologically traumatised, and
robbed of the choice of whether or not to be circumcised. These
problems can lead to difficulties with social and personal development
if not addressed.” That is how I feel about the issue.
Looking at the disadvantages, I would agree with these -
“Loss of the protection provided by the foreskin can allow abrasion of
the penis head to occur. This can result in scarring and loss of
physical sensation.”
Loss of physical sensation means that impotence is more likely and
loss of sex drive – could this be why the feminists medical
establishment has been slow to recommend a ban?
Contraception – pill
The female contraceptive pill was widely seen by the feminists as
giving the women control over whether or not to have a baby and was
the key turning point in their perceived battle with men in the 1970s.
The idea that women were somehow ‘forced’ to have babies to control
them was used by the feminists as an excuse for signing up women to
their movement. The reality is completely different. I would argue,
based on general observation of the subject rather than large scale
interviews that women are more likely to want babies than men. I
suspect that few non-feminists would disagree with this. Whilst there
are few statistics on this issue, I suspect there are a significant
number of men who were ‘trapped’ into having a baby without being
consulted. Many if not most of these believed that the woman was on
the pill. This unilateral power of decision as to whether a baby is
born is entirely discriminatory. Plus it undermines the trust between
the couple if a woman is prepared to make such an extremely important
decision as this entirely on her own. I wonder how many divorces
resulted from this breakdown of trust?
The pill needs to be taken continuously to provide protection and at
the same time every day. The protection can be lost through vomiting,
often after excessive alcohol intake. The ‘morning after pill’ has
been used as an alternative, but this can be considered to be an
‘abortion’ by some people, since if there is a fertilised egg heading
for the womb, it would be prevented from embedding and hence pass out
of the body – aborting the foetus within the day or two after
conception.
There is a male pill available – but how much publicity is given to
that? These pills are high in testosterone. One of the side effects
of TRT for men and the high levels of testosterone in the body is that
the sperm count is reduced and hence making it less likely that a baby
will be conceived.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/mens_hea…_sexpill.shtml
Contraception – condoms
Once again, the onus is on the man to take control. The male condom is
a huge disincentive to spontaneity. They are not easy to open the
packets nor to fit them on the man. They significantly reduce the
sensation for the man as they prevent the man ‘feeling’ the friction
between the penis and the vagina whilst having little or no effect on
the sensations for the women. How many men are put of having sex as a
result of knowing that they will have to use a condom? Surely this is
the reason that condoms have been widely promoted? The ‘Femidom’ is a
far better and more practical alternative. However, whilst the man
would notice little or know reduction in sensation, this time the
woman would miss out. Not surprisingly the male condom has been
promoted more than the female condom!.
Orgasm
Whilst we are in the details of sexual intercourse, it is worth
considering the ‘objective’ of sex – the orgasm. The male orgasm
normally marks the end of the sexual intercourse and misleading
statistics try to suggest that 99% of sex ends with the male orgasm. I
suspect it is far lower as men do not always reach orgasm. Inevitably,
the stress of the day, the pressure of performance, tiredness and all
medical conditions as well as the distractions unnecessarily provided
by the partner or the location all conspire to prevent the man fully
focusing on his orgasm and it does not happen. Where the
discrimination issue arises is regarding the female orgasm. The
feminists have been very successful in promoting the idea that it is
the man’s role to ’cause’ the woman’ orgasm as well. Thus he is under
pressure to ‘touch etc the correct ’spots’ on the woman before he has
his own orgasm. In view of the fact that this can take a long time
(albeit fun when you have the time!), it is unfair to pressurise the
man into believing he has ‘failed’ when he has an orgasm and she
doesn’t. Why shouldn’t the woman masturbate herself to orgasm as
preparation for sex? The pressure to achieve this orgasm, particularly
since the woman’s most sensitive point, the clitoris, does not
normally get stimulated during intercourse, is yet another factor in
undermining and removing the pleasure from sex.
Contraception – Abortion
I am sure I have covered this topic briefly before but it is an
important issue and worth repeating here. One of the worst aspects of
anti-male discrimination is that the father has absolutely no rights
whatsoever in deciding on the most important issue of all – whether
his baby lives or dies. Abortions are treated as 100% the mother’s
decision. The law has been distorted to reflect his unbelievable state
by decidi9ng through case law that a baby has absolutely no rights at
all unless and until it is ‘born’ – arrived outside the mother’s body
- even if still attached by an umbilical cord. Thus the baby is killed
inside the womb if it is to be aborted and then the body removed. If
it is born ‘alive’ then the medical people (theoretically) must try
and save it.
Anything that the mother does to the baby whilst she is pregnant
cannot be construed as ‘assault’ or ‘attempted’ murder’. The key case
resulted from an assault by a man who punched a pregnant woman. The
baby was born prematurely and died soon after. The court decided that
the man could not be prosecuted for assault on the baby, only the
mother. Thus the baby is considered to be nothing more than a ‘tumour’
as far as the abortion is concerned. The mother has the sole right to
decide whether to remove the tumour. This is unbelievably
discriminatory and unfair to the man.
homosexuality
At the same time the feminists try to encourage homosexuality. Thus
encouraging women to love only women, men each other, thereby both
sexes leave each other alone – chalk up another one for the feminists!
Tags: discrimination, female, gender, human rights, male, sex
